Mohit Rajhans take
Every time the “ban social media for teens” conversation flares up, it feels like adults trying to solve a messy cultural problem with a clean legal gesture. It is understandable. It is emotional. It is also a little bit fantasy.
The Independent’s argument is basically this: a blanket ban is clumsy, teenagers will route around it, and the real fix is media literacy for kids and adults, plus actual platform accountability.
I’m with that, with one important addition: in 2026, this is not just “social media.” It is AI-shaped social media, which means we are not teaching kids how to “use apps,” we are teaching them how to live inside persuasion engines.
A ban is simple to explain and easy to announce. It signals control. It gives parents a storyline.
But in real life, bans do three predictable things:
If your policy is “good kids will comply,” it is not a policy. It is a hope.
The Independent nails a point most debates dodge: adults did not get proper training either. We learned by getting fooled, outraged, scammed, and manipulated, then we called it “the internet.”
That gap is now bigger because AI lowers the cost of deception.
Our Dadspotting Crew takes a look at the latest from XBOX.
Read MoreHappy is the Place, The Chair has an affair and The School Rocks #HappyPlaceTo #TheChairAffair #SchoolofRock Previews.
Read MoreOur Dadspotting Writers are on the hunt for some great Back to School #BTS ideas for you and your kids. Here is Round 1 of some great items by Hilroy, Bogs and Simply Protein
Read More
